Skip to content

Minutes of the APPG AGM

August 15, 2016

Minutes of the APPG’s Annual General Meeting can be found here.


Event findings: wellbeing, inequality and social deprivation

May 6, 2016

Thank you to all those who attended our roundtable discussion on wellbeing, inequality and social deprivation, at Parliament a couple of weeks ago. The discussion was extremely stimulating, with interesting insights from both panellists and audience members.

The notes from the discussion can be found here:

Notes from roundtable – wellbeing inequality social deprivation FINAL

Wellbeing, inequality and social deprivation: A roundtable discussion

March 21, 2016


Date:    Wednesday 20 April 2016

Time:   09:30 – 11:00

Venue:  Committee Room 8, Houses of Parliament, London SW1A 0AA

Chairs: Jon Cruddas MP and Baroness Tyler (co-chairs of the APPG on wellbeing economics)

In recent years, there has been increasing recognition of the need to look beyond measures of average wellbeing to explore inequalities in wellbeing, and particularly those with very low wellbeing. There has similarly been a growing interest in exploring a concept of social deprivation which recognises forms of deprivation which are likely associated with, but go beyond, material deprivation.

In this roundtable, we will bring together experts in wellbeing, inequalities and social deprivation to explore these issues further. We will ask:

  • How might wellbeing help to produce a wider conception of social deprivation, and what does this add to existing concepts of material deprivation?
  • What would policy that focussed on improving the lives of those with very low wellbeing look like in practice? How might it differ from existing approaches focussed on alleviating deprivation?
  • How would the focus on wellbeing inequalities change the existing wellbeing agenda in government?

Confirmed speakers include;

  • Baroness Ruth Lister – Emeritus Professor of Social Policy at Loughborough University
  • Lord Gus O’Donnell – Former Cabinet Secretary and non-Executive Chairman of Frontier (Europe)
  • Lord Richard Layard – Emeritus Professor of Economics at the London School of Economics
  • Dr Simon Sandberg – Consultant for Lambeth Council and wellbeing expert
  • Dr Kimberley Brownlee – Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Warwick

Please register as places are limited

APPG Roundtable event: How should we measure national success?

February 3, 2016

1st March 2016, 09:30-11:00. Committee Room 11, House of Commons

Chair: Mark Easton, BBC News Home Editor

In advance of the forthcoming review of the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Measuring National Wellbeing initiative, this invitation-only event will bring together parliamentarians and a key players from across civil society and the business world to discuss the question: ‘How should we measure national success?’

The roundtable will open with a brief presentation by the New Economics Foundation, summarising their recent call on the ONS to adopt five headline indicators that focus on Good Jobs, Wellbeing, Environment, Fairness and Health, to ensure that policy-making reflects public priorities and engages the electorate. The presentation will be followed by reflections from parliamentarians, and a roundtable discussion exploring the issues raised, and the possibilities of further parliamentary activity on this topic.

Publication of report: Wellbeing in four policy areas

September 11, 2014

The APPG is pleased to announce the publication of its first report, ‘Wellbeing in four policy areas’, which is now available to download here. A launch event will take place on Tuesday 14th October from 11.30-13.00 in the Houses of Parliament: places are free but limited. Register here.

The report is the result of a year-long inquiry exploring how wellbeing evidence can be translated into policy in four diverse areas: labour markets, planning and transport, mindfulness in health and education, and arts and culture.

Key recommendations of the report include:

  • Focus on stable jobs over growth: More than half the UK workforce are worried about losing their jobs, with disastrous consequences for their wellbeing and productivity – sickness leave alone costs an estimated £100bn a year. Secure, stable employment should be the primary focus of economic policy.
  • More green spaces in our cities: Planning processes have lost sight of their original mission to improve community wellbeing. Restoring this would transform local areas, with considerable economic benefits – city liveability is a major consideration for big employers, while encouraging residents to take up walking or cycling could save the NHS £675m a year.
  • Mindfulness training for doctors and teachers: Mental health problems cost the UK economy an estimated £70bn annually. Training new medical and teaching staff in mindfulness techniques would embed a culture of wellbeing in health and education, and reduce a later burden on the NHS by improving the availability of mindfulness-based therapies.
  • Invest in arts and culture: Wellbeing evidence gives a robust means of measuring the value of non-market goods. Arts and culture play an important part in all our lives, and wellbeing data will help make the case for spending in these areas.

The group’s chair, David Lammy MP, said:

“It has been eight years since David Cameron first declared his intention to measure wellbeing, and in that time the financial crisis has shifted many people’s priorities. But in fact wellbeing matters more, not less, in times of economic difficulties.”

“Fundamentally this is about creating the conditions for people to live better lives, which should be the primary objective of all policy. We cannot be distracted by figures of GDP growth without assessing what this really means for people’s lives. This report outlines in practical terms what action the Government can take to increase wellbeing and shift focus onto the need to improve the quality of life in this country.”

“It’s too easy to focus simply on headline figures of unemployment and GDP. Wellbeing economics goes deeper than that and means measuring what really matters to people – whether their jobs are secure, whether they pay well, and whether they offer opportunities for progression. Our inquiry shows how all parties can put in place the building blocks of a high wellbeing recovery.”

Vice-Chair Baroness Claire Tyler said:

“This timely report shows how four years’ worth of UK wellbeing evidence can be used to target limited public spending more effectively to improve people’s lives, as well as deliver significant long-term savings to the public purse.”

 “We heard compelling evidence that promoting fair pay and reducing inequality are vital building blocks of a high wellbeing society. As well as tackling low pay, this means much greater transparency on pay at the top, and on pay differentials within firms.

“Good policy is based on solid evidence. We should be making full use of our comprehensive wellbeing data.”

For press inquiries please contact

Meeting 5: The O’Donnell Report

June 24, 2014

Our fifth and final evidence session took a step back from policy detail to explore overarching questions about the role of well-being in policy, and the challenges that must be overcome to accelerate the shift to a well-being approach.

We were joined by keynote speaker Lord Gus O’Donnell, former Cabinet Secretary, who introduced his recent report as Chair of the Legatum Commission on Wellbeing and Policy. Our two respondents were Lord Richard Layard, fellow Legatum Commissioner and member of the APG as well as a leading expert on well-being economics, and Simon Fiander, Clerk to the Environmental Audit Committee, who gave an overview of their own recently published report on well-being.

This was followed by a wide ranging discussion, from how a well-being approach could be applied to budget allocation at the level of government departments, to whether a values shift was needed to reassert the importance of non-material factors in the political discourse. Full notes of the discussion are available here.

Meeting 4: Planning, transport and well-being

June 10, 2014

The fourth evidence session of the APPG’s inquiry on well-being and policy was held on 12th May 2014 under the heading “Planning, transport and well-being”. This session examined the evidence about how the built environment can support well-being, and what this means for planning and transport policy.



Kathy MacEwen, Head of Planning and Enabling, Design Council Cabe

Anna Scott-Marshall, Head of External Affairs, Royal Institute of British Architects

Stephen Joseph, Chief Executive, Campaign for Better Transport

Steve Quartermain, Chief Planner, Department for Communities and Local Government

Group Members

David Lammy MP (chair), Baroness Claire Tyler, Helen Goodman MP, Chris Ruane MP, Lord Richard Layard, Lord Alan Howarth


The session opened with a presentation from Saamah Abdallah, Senior Researcher at NEF, introducing the evidence on planning and well-being. We heard how the built environment can influence well-being through the provision of green spaces, social spaces and opportunities for active transport like cycling and walking; and how the planning process can also influence well-being by involving communities in shaping the places they live.

This was followed by a wide-ranging discussion in which a number of themes emerged:

  • Well-being centred planning makes economic sense in the long run –  for instance, providing opportunities for physical activity saves public money through improved public health; prioritising green space and active transport reduces pollution, which has long-term economic and health benefits.
  • It is important to be clear what the objective of ‘well-being centred planning’ is and how this connects to other policy objectives. For instance, well-being evidence may not suggest a demonstrable case for protecting green belts, but this may support other policy objectives such as protecting ecosystems or preventing settlements from merging. We also need to consider well-being impacts on vulnerable groups as well as aggregate well-being – for example, by creating inclusive built environments that are accessible for an ageing population.
  • Existing tools of policy appraisal are inadequate for a well-being approach. Conventional cost-benefit analysis ignores or under-values many of the impacts which matter most for well-being, such as community cohesion or air and noise pollution. This skews the system towards certain policy outcomes (for instance, road building) which may not optimise well-being.

Full notes of the discussion are available here. Saamah Abdallah’s slides are available here.